This is a user interface specification, not a working service!
This line will be removed when the service is ready!
For some of the information, this spec shows multiple different lines, where only some of the lines will actually be used.
The URLs in the text below will not be the same in the service as in this specification.



Group Evaluation Report?

Issue Which of these places would you like as a venue for future IETF meetings?
Options

A

Danvers

B

Chicago

C

San Jose

D

Los Angeles

E

Memphis

F

Dallas

G

Washington D.C.

H

Munich, Germany
Rating scale:

1

Very good

2

Good

3

Acceptable

4

Bad

5

Very bad
 

0

Abstain or did not evaluate
Responses
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
comments
jsmith@foo.bar
1
2
1
4
4
4
2
3
 
mary@foo.net
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
comment
cleopatra@ietf.org
2
2
3
4
5
5
5
0
comment
 
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Very good
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Good
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
Acceptable
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bad
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
Very bad
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
Abstain
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Average
1.7
2.0
2.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
2.7
3.5
Who is asking? This query was sent by
Name: Jacob Palme
E-mail: jpalme@dsv.su.se
Phone: +46-8-16 16 67
Fax: +46-8-783 08 29
Postal address: Skeppargatan 73, SE-115 30 Stockholm, Sweden
Who can respond? Anyone, through a form on the web.
All who get this form by e-mail, it is sent to the mailing list: ietf@ietf.org.
All who get this form by personal e-mail.
When can you respond? Your response must be sent before 10 August 1998:00:00+02:00. Results will be recomputed with new responses up to that time.
When will results be available? Results will be available from 1 August 1998:00:00+02:00.
More information: More information about this query.
More information about the query service.
Who are providing this service?
legal.
Comments: From: mary@foo.net
Date: 5 Aug 1998
Why did you not include Moscow in the options.

From: cleopatra@ietf.org
Date: 3 Aug 1998
Some of the cities proposed do not have any building suiltable for an IETF meeting. So it is meaningless to ask people's views on those locations.